Conrado Rodríguez
Conrado Rodríguez is a Uruguayan politician affiliated with the National Party, known for his significant role in parliamentary discussions around education reform. He has been vocal about maintaining the outcomes of the 2020 referendum related to the Law of Urgent Consideration (LUC) and emphasizes the importance of respecting democratic decisions. Rodríguez advocates for a balanced approach to educational governance, recognizing the need to incorporate feedback from educators and stakeholders while navigating the political landscape.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 2 | 4.50 | 0.19% | +0% | 3,473,730 | 6,469 | $54,000 | 101$ |
| Totals | 2 | 3,473,730 | 6,469 | $54,000 | 101$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez criticized Sanjurjo's response to Bordaberry and questioned his role in the government.
4
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez expressed outrage over the situation and called for explanations from the Ministry.
5
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez is a member of the Colorado Party who recommended voting negatively on the project.
5
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez is a deputy who recommended against voting for the budget project.
5
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez is a deputy who previously presented a proposal in the Chamber of Deputies.
5
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez is recognized for his role in the Colorado Party.
5
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez proposed an amendment allowing legislators to request information from the Presidency.
6
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez proposed an alternative regarding the judicial intervention process.
6
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez justified his rejection of the project due to 'erroneous economic projections' and a lack of control mechanisms.
3
Uruguay:
Conrado Rodríguez, a deputy from the Partido Colorado, discussed the need for clarity in the procedure regarding the DGI's proposal.
5