Enma Tapia
Enma Tapia is a prominent judge and the president of the Labor Chamber of the National Court of Justice in Ecuador. She is known for her role in interpreting labor laws and has recently been in the news for her stance regarding the payment of severance bonuses in cases of voluntary retirement. In a recent ruling, she stated that such payments are not applicable when a worker voluntarily ends their employment, which has sparked debate among labor officials and unions over the implications for both private and public sector workers.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 6 | 5.17 | 0.56% | +10% | 17,643,060 | 108,928 | $108,000 | 667$ |
| Totals | 6 | 17,643,060 | 108,928 | $108,000 | 667$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia resigned from her position as substitute president of the National Court of Justice.
5
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia was the acting vice president of the CNJ who also resigned from her position.
5
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia was the acting vice president of the National Court of Justice before also resigning irrevocably.
5
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia resigned as the substitute president of the National Court of Justice.
5
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia also resigned from the position of acting president.
4
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia resigned from the acting presidency of the National Court of Justice in Ecuador.
7
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia was one of the judges who expressed concern over the current state of the justice system in a letter to José Suing.
6
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia is the acting president of the National Court and has stated that José Suing lacks support to continue in his presidency.
7
Ecuador:
Enma Tapia is the subrogant president of the Corte Nacional de Justicia and is advocating for José Suing to resign.
6
Ecuador:
Judge Enma Tapia highlighted on social media that the full court resolved contradictory rulings for the first time.
8