Fabricio Alvarado
Fabricio Alvarado is a Costa Rican politician representing the Nueva República party. He has gained attention for his stance on various social issues, including his recent involvement in legislative discussions surrounding the duty of religious leaders to report sexual crimes. Alvarado has voiced concerns over the implications of such laws on religious freedoms, particularly regarding the confidentiality of the sacrament of confession.
Born on Oct 05, 1974 (51 years old)
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costa Rica | 19 | 5.05 | 1.70% | +380% | 5,094,118 | 415,549 | $62,000 | 5,058$ |
| Totals | 19 | 5,094,118 | 415,549 | $62,000 | 5,058$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado was another presidential candidate who chose to abstain from debates during the 2018 elections.
5
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado was the presidential candidate for the National Restoration Party in the 2018 elections.
5
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado is a legislator who announced that his party will vote against lifting the immunity of President Chaves.
6
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado is the leader of the Nueva República party and a candidate for president.
5
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado arrived late to the discussion about the date for the debate but confirmed that Chaves would attend.
5
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado commented on the political dynamics surrounding the vote on Rodrigo Chaves' immunity.
5
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado is a candidate from the Nueva República party.
5
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado is a deputy from Nueva República who presented a text related to the religious broadcasters.
5
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado was accused of sexual crimes against a minor.
2
Costa Rica:
Fabricio Alvarado rejected warnings from José Miguel Villalobos regarding the consequences of supporting the lifting of presidential immunity.
7