Janine Prado
Janine Prado is a Panamanian politician and member of the Vamos coalition, known for her advocacy on behalf of vulnerable populations, particularly the elderly. In a recent speech, she demanded immediate action from the Ministry of Social Development regarding alarming reports of abuse and negligence in senior care facilities in Panama. Prado called for thorough audits, exemplary sanctions, and a transparent supervision system to protect the rights and dignity of older adults.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panama | 8 | 5.88 | 0.76% | +190% | 4,314,768 | 94,884 | $76,000 | 1,671$ |
| Totals | 8 | 4,314,768 | 94,884 | $76,000 | 1,671$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Panama:
Janine Prado is a deputy who questioned the minister about transfers to municipalities.
5
Panama:
Janine Prado is a deputy who called for an audit of the funds transferred to municipalities.
5
Panama:
Janine Prado is a deputy from the independent Vamos bench who questioned the Minister of Economy and Finance about transfers to communal boards.
6
Panama:
Janine Prado emphasized that all citizens have the right to know how public resources are managed.
7
Panama:
Janine Prado is a deputy who expressed her concerns regarding the transfer of funds to municipalities.
6
Panama:
Janine Prado, a deputy from the Vamos party, presented three habeas data actions to the Supreme Court regarding transparency in the National Assembly.
7
Panama:
Janine Prado pointed out discussions in 'el cuartito' regarding the budget transfers.
5
Panama:
Janine Prado opposed the idea of suspending some budget transfers and emphasized the need for respect among colleagues.
6
Panama:
Janine Prado warned that the accumulated debt for the payment of seniority bonuses has become a structural problem.
6
Panama:
Janine Prado criticized the decision as an attack on citizens' rights.
2