
Juan David Riveros
Juan David Riveros is a prominent lawyer associated with Grupo Keralty, who recently spoke out following the Constitutional Court's decision to revoke the government's intervention in EPS Sanitas. His legal insights emphasize the importance of understanding the full implications of the court's ruling and indicate a commitment to holding accountable those responsible for the challenges faced by the company and its users during the intervention.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia | 7 | 5.29 | 0.41% | +20% | 50,882,884 | 251,717 | $350,000 | 1,731$ |
Totals | 7 | 50,882,884 | 251,717 | $350,000 | 1,731$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros, the lawyer for Keralty, stated that the government's attitude is not surprising.
5
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros represented Víctor Manuel Henríquez in the case.
5
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros is the lawyer representing Keralty in a legal action against the President.
5
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros is the lawyer for the Spanish company Keralty who commented on the president's statements and potential legal actions.
5
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros is the lawyer for Keralty who discusses the legal actions against President Petro.
5
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros, the lawyer for Keralty, stated that the donations made by the company were legal and registered.
5
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros is the lawyer representing Keralty in their legal actions against President Gustavo Petro.
7
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros, the lawyer for Keralty, expressed the need for accountability from the judicial authorities regarding the situation.
6
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros announced that Keralty will continue legal actions following the situation with Sanitas.
6
Colombia:
Juan David Riveros, the lawyer for the Keralty group, stated that the decision of the Constitutional Court is not an end, but a beginning.
6