Mihail Diaconu
Mihail Diaconu has been active in the judiciary since June 2004, starting his career at the Buiucani Court and later serving at the Chișinău Court of Appeal. He faced public scrutiny for his decisions during the 2009 protests in Moldova, yet maintained his position. Diaconu was appointed to the Chișinău Court of Appeal in 2018, despite protests against his promotion due to his past rulings.
Born on Jun 17, 2004 (21 years old)
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moldova | 1 | 5.00 | 0.13% | +20% | 4,033,963 | 6,420 | $12,000 | 19$ |
| Totals | 1 | 4,033,963 | 6,420 | $12,000 | 19$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu also participated in the competition for the position of judge at the Supreme Court of Justice alongside Victor Micu.
5
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu is a judge at the Chișinău Court of Appeal who has been involved in multiple corruption cases.
2
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu was released from his position as a judge at the Court of Appeal Center after failing an external evaluation.
3
Moldova:
The examination of the report regarding Mihail Diaconu's external evaluation was postponed.
5
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu is a suspended judge accused of influence trafficking.
3
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu is a judge accused of facilitating influence trafficking.
3
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu is a judge at the Court of Appeal Center who is under investigation for influence trafficking.
3
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu is a judge at the Court of Appeal Center who refused to attend a hearing organized by the Vetting Commission.
5
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu is a judge at the Court of Appeal Center who has been invited for a hearing regarding doubts about his integrity.
5
Moldova:
Mihail Diaconu is a judge who has been incorrectly identified in a disciplinary case but has a history of involvement in significant judicial events.
5