Prashant Patil
Prashant Patil is a prominent lawyer known for representing clients in high-profile legal cases in India. Recently, he gained media attention for his role in the Pune Porsche crash case, where he successfully argued that the offences attributed to a 17-year-old involved in the incident did not qualify as 'heinous' under the Juvenile Justice Act. His legal expertise and interpretation of Supreme Court rulings played a crucial role in the Juvenile Justice Board's decision to reject the police's plea to try the minor as an adult.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 5.00 | 0.08% | +0% | 1,380,004,385 | 1,044,666 | $2,900,000 | 2,195$ |
| Totals | 1 | 1,380,004,385 | 1,044,666 | $2,900,000 | 2,195$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
India:
The teenager's lawyer Prashant Patil said, 'We had argued, among other things, that the offences attributed to the minor could not be termed as 'heinous' in nature considering the SC ruling.'
5