Sorina Marinaș
Sorina Marinaș is a judge at the Craiova Court of Appeal, known for her outspoken criticism of the Superior Council of Magistracy (CSM) in Romania. She has publicly addressed issues such as lack of transparency in the judiciary, delays in decision-making, and the erosion of public trust in the legal system. In a recent Facebook post, she emphasized the importance of accountability and quality in justice, arguing that judges cannot demand respect without delivering results. Her forthright comments highlight the challenges faced by the judicial system in Romania and reflect a growing discontent within the ranks of magistrates regarding their working conditions and public perception.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
No country-level mention data available.
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Romania:
Sorina Marinaș is a judge involved in a controversy regarding her internal discussions that became public.
4
Romania:
Sorina Marinaș initiated the petition for justice reform.
5
Romania:
Sorina Marinaș is the initiator of the petition for the independence of judges and has been involved in discussions regarding the implications of judicial delegations.
4
Romania:
Sorina Marinaș is a judge who has publicly criticized the Judicial Inspection for its repercussions on magistrates speaking out about judicial issues.
7
Moldova:
Sorina Marinaș published a public message of solidarity with judges Laurențiu Beșu and Raluca Moroșanu.
6
Moldova:
Judge Sorina Marinaș published a message of solidarity from nearly 180 magistrates.
6
Romania:
Judge Sorina Mărinaș is accused of violating the Code of Ethics after commenting on a historic ruling on Facebook.
6
Romania:
Judge Sorina Mărinaș commented with satisfaction on a decision regarding a man sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempted murder of his wife.
9
Romania:
Sorina Marinaș, a judge at the Craiova Court of Appeal, harshly criticizes the way the Superior Council of Magistracy communicates publicly and calls for a change in how internal judicial issues are managed.
6