Achmad Nur Hidayat
Achmad Nur Hidayat is a public policy expert affiliated with UPN Veteran Jakarta, focusing on the implications of political coalitions on public service delivery and governance in Indonesia. He is often cited in discussions regarding the balance between political interests and the welfare of the citizenry.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 5 | 5.00 | 0.50% | +30% | 273,523,615 | 1,788,635 | $1,119,000 | 7,317$ |
| Totals | 5 | 273,523,615 | 1,788,635 | $1,119,000 | 7,317$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat is a public policy expert who discussed the challenges facing Danantara.
5
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat criticized Bank Indonesia for being late in anticipating global economic situations.
4
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat is an economist who argued that the current economic situation is not comparable to 1998 due to the absence of a political crisis.
6
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat, an economist and public policy expert at UPN Veteran Jakarta, commented on the government's stimulus measures for the public.
5
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat, an economist and public policy expert, argues that the intervention costs incurred by Bank Indonesia to stabilize the rupiah are quite high and ultimately ineffective.
5
Indonesia:
Achmad is an economist who comments on the decline in the number of travelers during Lebaran.
5
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat warned that the weakening trend of state revenue could widen the budget deficit throughout 2025.
5
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat warned that the weakening trend of state revenue could widen the APBN deficit throughout 2025.
5
Indonesia:
Achmad Nur Hidayat is an economist commenting on the broader implications of the Sritex case for the textile industry.
5
Indonesia:
Achmad expressed concerns that a permanent coalition could negatively impact the quality of public services.
4