Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi is a prominent member of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, known for his judicial insights and contributions to legal reform. He was part of the bench that recently addressed the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial system, emphasizing the need for systematic improvements to enhance judicial efficiency.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 6 | 6.17 | 0.27% | +30% | 220,892,331 | 779,620 | $280,000 | 988$ |
| Totals | 6 | 220,892,331 | 779,620 | $280,000 | 988$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Pakistan:
Justices Ayesha A. Malik and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi had dismissed the review petitions on the first day of hearings.
5
Pakistan:
Justices Ayesha A. Malik and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi had dismissed the review petitions on the first day of hearings.
5
Pakistan:
A two-member bench comprising Justice Shah and Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi heard the matter.
8
Pakistan:
Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi was part of the bench that dismissed the review petitions.
7
Pakistan:
Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi was part of the bench that declared the applications inadmissible.
6
Pakistan:
Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi also dismissed the review petitions on the first day of the hearing.
6
Pakistan:
Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi rejected the review petitions filed by the PML-N, Election Commission of Pakistan and PPP along with Justice Malik.
5
Pakistan:
Justice Malik, along with Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, had earlier dismissed a set of review petitions filed by the PML-N, PPP and the Election Commission of Pakistan.
5
Pakistan:
Justice Malik, along with Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, had earlier dismissed a set of review petitions filed by the PML-N, PPP and the Election Commission of Pakistan.
5
Pakistan:
Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi also insisted on formally recording his opposition to the issuance of notices to the respondents.
6