
Qazi Faez Isa
Qazi Faez Isa is a prominent Pakistani jurist who served as the Chief Justice of Pakistan. Known for his commitment to upholding constitutional rights and judicial independence, he gained significant attention for his progressive rulings and for advocating for the rule of law. During his tenure, he inaugurated the fundamental rights monument, marking his dedication to civil liberties.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pakistan | 5 | 5.40 | 0.14% | +20% | 220,892,331 | 379,540 | $280,000 | 481$ |
Totals | 5 | 220,892,331 | 379,540 | $280,000 | 481$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Pakistan:
Former Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa is mentioned as the father-in-law of Barrister Asadullah.
6
Pakistan:
Qazi Faez Isa is referenced in the context of a legal reference filed against him by the government.
5
Pakistan:
The decision to nullify Justice Najafi's suspension of appointments was made by the apex court headed by then-CJP Qazi Faez Isa.
5
Pakistan:
Justice Qazi Faez Isa had previously taken legal action to protect his position within the judiciary.
6
Pakistan:
Qazi Faez Isa is a former Chief Justice who faced an attack in the UK.
5
Pakistan:
The government claimed that X didn’t respond adequately to requests for blocking accounts involved in defamatory campaigns against Qazi Faez Isa.
4
Pakistan:
Shahbaz Sharif expressed gratitude to Qazi Faez Isa for transferring funds to the national treasury.
8
Pakistan:
Qazi Faez Isa explained that the Arshad Sharif case was not fixed before a five-judge larger bench as it didn’t require any constitutional interpretation.
7
Pakistan:
Former chief justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa had explained that the Arshad Sharif murder case was not fixed before a five-judge larger bench.
5
Pakistan:
Qazi Faez Isa faced a toxic reference that reflects the ongoing challenges within the judiciary.
5