Gali Beharav Miara
Gali Beharav Miara is the Attorney General of Israel, who has been urged by various organizations to investigate and take legal action against Said Hassanin for his alleged support of terrorism and inflammatory remarks against Israel. Her role is crucial in determining the legal ramifications of such statements within the context of Israeli law.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 5.00 | 0.11% | +30% | 9,216,900 | 12,706 | $400,000 | 551$ |
| Totals | 1 | 9,216,900 | 12,706 | $400,000 | 551$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is mentioned as the legal advisor to the government who is allegedly being targeted.
5
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara opposes the move, arguing that the investigation should not be removed from the general prosecution.
7
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is the legal advisor to the government who responded to the High Court regarding the appointment of a judge.
7
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is the legal advisor to the government who wrote a letter to the Minister of Justice regarding the legality of appointing a complaints commissioner for judges.
7
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is the legal advisor to the government who is transferring the investigation's oversight to the state attorney.
5
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is the legal advisor to the government who received the findings of the investigation.
5
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is the legal advisor to the government who provided an update on the state's efforts to recruit Haredim.
7
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is the legal advisor to the government who received a death threat.
7
Israel:
Gali Beharav-Miara is the legal advisor to the government facing potential dismissal.
5
Israel:
Gali Beharav Miara is the legal advisor who commented on the proposed legislation that could lead to the complete politicization of senior public service roles.
5