Jacob Roth
Jacob Roth is an attorney representing the federal government in a legal case concerning the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies. He argued before the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals that the temporary restraining order issued by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, which aimed to block the use of certain profiling factors in immigration stops, was overly broad and claimed that the immigrant advocates failed to provide sufficient evidence of an official policy of violating constitutional rights.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4.00 | 0.04% | +0% | 331,002,651 | 136,440 | $21,000,000 | 8,656$ |
| Canada | 1 | 4.00 | 0.08% | +0% | 38,005,238 | 30,823 | $1,700,000 | 1,379$ |
| Totals | 2 | 369,007,889 | 167,263 | $22,700,000 | 10,035$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Canada:
Attorney Jacob Roth argued that the lower court’s order was too broad and lacked sufficient evidence.
4
United States:
Attorney Jacob Roth argued that the lower court’s order was too broad and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence.
4