Jorge Ibáñez
Jorge Ibáñez is a magistrate of the Constitutional Court known for his strong defense of judicial independence and constitutional integrity in Colombia. In recent discussions surrounding the court's challenges, he has highlighted the critical role the court plays in upholding democratic values and the rule of law, emphasizing the dangers posed by governmental attempts to undermine its authority.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | 5.33 | 0.18% | +10% | 50,882,884 | 99,416 | $350,000 | 684$ |
| Totals | 3 | 50,882,884 | 99,416 | $350,000 | 684$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Colombia:
Magistrate Jorge Ibáñez ordered the practice of tests regarding a decree in the Cámara de Representantes.
5
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez reported a net worth of 1.573 billion pesos among the magistrates of the Constitutional Court.
6
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is the President of the Constitutional Court mentioned in relation to the letter from the Banco de la República.
5
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is a magistrate who emphasized the independence of judges in the face of political pressure.
5
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is a magistrate who will decide on the future of the 'decretazo' in the Constitutional Court.
4
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is the magistrate in charge of the case regarding the decree in the Constitutional Court.
5
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is a magistrate who saved his vote regarding the suspension of the process against President Petro.
5
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is the president of the Constitutional Court who expressed concerns about the suspension of the legal process against President Petro.
5
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is one of the magistrates who dissented from the decision to suspend the investigation against President Petro.
5
Colombia:
Jorge Ibáñez is one of the magistrates who voted against the decision.
5