Javier Laynez
Javier Laynez is a Minister of the Supreme Court of Mexico, recognized for his legal expertise and involvement in pivotal judicial decisions. He was mentioned in the news as one of the four ministers requested to recuse himself from voting on the judicial election issue due to prior statements against the election process.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venezuela | 1 | 4.00 | 0.06% | +0% | 28,435,943 | 17,171 | $48,000 | 29$ |
| Bolivia | 1 | 4.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 11,673,021 | 6,186 | $40,000 | 21$ |
| Mexico | 1 | 5.00 | 0.09% | +0% | 128,932,753 | 120,273 | $1,200,000 | 1,119$ |
| Uruguay | 1 | 4.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 3,473,730 | 1,872 | $54,000 | 29$ |
| Totals | 4 | 172,515,447 | 145,502 | $1,342,000 | 1,198$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Mexico:
Javier Laynez is a minister involved in the urgent constitutional controversy presented by Abelina López.
5
Uruguay:
Javier Laynez is a Supreme Court minister who is one of the main critics of the judicial reform.
4
Bolivia:
Javier Laynez is a Supreme Court minister who has been a principal critic of the judicial reform.
4
Venezuela:
Javier Laynez is a minister of the Supreme Court who criticizes the judicial reform.
4
Mexico:
Minister Javier Laynez clarified that the IFT has not disappeared and its actions are valid.
9
Mexico:
Javier Laynez is a minister in the Second Chamber of the SCJN.
5
Mexico:
Javier Laynez is an expert in fiscal matters involved in the Supreme Court.
5
Mexico:
Javier Laynez is a former tax attorney and a minister at the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation.
7
Mexico:
Javier Laynez is a minister of the Supreme Court who was requested to be excused from voting on a judicial reform matter.
5
Mexico:
Javier Laynez is another minister requested to excuse himself from voting on the judicial election due to prior statements.
5