
Jorge Bogarín
Jorge Bogarín is a member of the Jury of Impeachment of Magistrates in Paraguay, involved in judicial proceedings and scrutiny of magistrates' conduct. His role became particularly relevant in the context of a corruption scandal involving communications with politicians and judges.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paraguay | 5 | 4.00 | 0.37% | +20% | 7,132,538 | 31,889 | $38,000 | 170$ |
Totals | 5 | 7,132,538 | 31,889 | $38,000 | 170$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín was included in the discussion about individuals labeled as significantly corrupt.
4
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín, the minister of the TSJE, expressed confidence in the process of renting voting machines.
7
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín is accused of trying to take control of the Political Science school at the National University of Asunción.
2
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín has been declared significantly corrupt by the U.S. government but was elected as the most voted non-teaching representative in the recent elections for the board of the Faculty of Law.
4
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín was mentioned in connection with Marco Aurelio González regarding a significant corruption issue.
3
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín, the minister of the Superior Electoral Justice Tribunal, emphasized the constitutional deadlines for elections.
8
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín is mentioned as significantly corrupt and was accompanied by Marco Aurelio González during electoral activities.
2
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín is the leader of the Es Nuestro Momento movement and a candidate for a position on the Board of the Faculty of Law at the National University of Asunción.
3
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín was an ex-member of the Jurado de Enjuiciamiento de Magistrados who was contacted by Lalo Gomes to support Ana Aguirre.
3
Paraguay:
Jorge Bogarín questioned the legitimacy of the company that obtained the precautionary measure.
6