Jorge Rodríguez Vives
Jorge Rodríguez Vives is a Costa Rican politician and the Minister of Culture, known for his role in shaping cultural policies in the country. Recently, he co-signed a decree that modifies the requirements for declaring activities of cultural interest, which aims to provide clearer regulations for cultural events and projects.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costa Rica | 3 | 5.67 | 0.50% | +0% | 5,094,118 | 25,599 | $62,000 | 312$ |
| Totals | 3 | 5,094,118 | 25,599 | $62,000 | 312$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives is the president of the Board of Directors and the Minister of Culture and Youth.
6
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives is the minister of Culture and Youth involved in the administrative process regarding the Teatro Nacional.
6
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives, the Minister of Culture and Youth, was ordered to conclude the administrative process regarding the case.
5
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives, the Minister of Culture, filed a complaint regarding the damages to the Escuela Metálica.
7
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives is the Minister of Culture and Youth who received a report regarding the restoration issues at the National Theater.
5
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives is the Minister of Culture and Youth involved in the administrative process regarding the damages at the Teatro Nacional.
5
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives is the Minister of Culture and Youth who informed Apuy about his award.
7
Costa Rica:
The report was sent to the office of Minister of Culture Jorge Rodríguez Vives.
5
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez announced the opening of an investigation regarding the restoration procedures of the National Theater.
5
Costa Rica:
Jorge Rodríguez Vives received support from Asian accounts regarding a court ruling.
6