Yoon Kap-keun
Yoon Kap-keun is a lawyer representing former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, who recently faced impeachment and removal from office due to his controversial declaration of martial law. Despite the constitutional court's unanimous decision to uphold the impeachment, Yoon Kap-keun described the ruling as 'completely incomprehensible' and criticized it as a 'purely political decision.' His defense of Yoon Suk Yeol highlights his commitment to challenging the legal proceedings against the former president, amidst a backdrop of significant political turmoil in South Korea.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3.00 | 0.03% | +0% | 67,886,011 | 18,171 | $2,700,000 | 723$ |
| Liechtenstein | 1 | 3.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 38,137 | 18 | $6,900 | 3$ |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5.00 | 0.07% | +0% | 273,523,615 | 202,911 | $1,119,000 | 830$ |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3.00 | 0.10% | +0% | 23,816,775 | 23,675 | $670,000 | 666$ |
| Australia | 1 | 4.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 25,499,884 | 12,611 | $1,380,000 | 682$ |
| Ireland | 1 | 3.00 | 0.04% | +0% | 5,030,000 | 2,104 | $5,100 | 2$ |
| Totals | 6 | 395,794,422 | 259,490 | $5,881,000 | 2,906$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Taiwan:
Yoon Kap-keun called the ruling 'completely incomprehensible' and a 'pure political decision.'
3
Liechtenstein:
Yoon Kap-keun called the impeachment decision 'completely incomprehensible' and 'purely political'.
3
Ireland:
Yoon Kap-keun is one of Mr Yoon’s lawyers who called the ruling 'completely incomprehensible'.
3
Indonesia:
Yoon Kap-keun is one of Yoon Suk Yeol's lawyers who criticized the impeachment ruling.
5
Australia:
Yoon Kap-keun, one of Yoon’s lawyers, called the ruling 'completely incomprehensible' and a 'pure political decision'.
4
United Kingdom:
Yoon Kap-keun described the judgement as 'completely incomprehensible' and a 'purely political decision'.
3