Jagdeep Dhankhar
Jagdeep Dhankhar is an Indian politician and lawyer who serves as the Vice President of India. He has a background in law and has been associated with various political roles in the state of Rajasthan before assuming his current position. His involvement in national events, such as attending the Maha Kumbh, highlights his engagement with cultural and religious activities in India.
Born on Jul 18, 1950 (74 years old)
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 6.50 | 0.21% | +0% | 1,380,004,385 | 2,906,802 | $2,900,000 | 6,108$ |
| Paraguay | 1 | 8.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 7,132,538 | 3,717 | $38,000 | 20$ |
| Totals | 5 | 1,387,136,923 | 2,910,519 | $2,938,000 | 6,128$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
India:
The legislative revamp of the judges-selecting-judges system was fuelled by Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar's statements.
6
India:
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar emphasized the importance of legal due process in the context of judicial accountability.
6
Paraguay:
Jagdeep Dhankhar is the Vice President of India who will meet with Santiago Peña during his visit.
8
India:
Jagdeep Dhankhar praised Operation Sindoor and highlighted India's stance against terrorism.
9
India:
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar said Parliament is supreme and that the judiciary cannot impose timelines or usurp the powers of the President or governors.
5
India:
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar reiterated that 'Parliament is supreme' and that elected legislators are the 'ultimate masters.'
8
India:
Vice-president Jagdeep Dhankhar had strongly criticised the Supreme Court.
3
India:
Jagdeep Dhankhar is the Vice President who criticized the Supreme Court's directive.
4
India:
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has been criticized for his comments targeting the Supreme Court.
2
India:
Jagdeep Dhankhar criticised the Supreme Court’s judgment, saying some judges are now 'legislating' and performing 'executive functions.'
3