James Rogers
James Rogers is a Senior Counsel for America First Legal (AFL), an organization known for advocating for policies that align with the Trump administration's agenda. He has played a significant role in legal discussions surrounding presidential authority, particularly in the context of immigration law and national security. Recently, Rogers was in the news for his support of President Trump's invocation of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to facilitate deportations, arguing that judicial interference with the President's decisions is unconstitutional.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7.50 | 0.04% | +0% | 331,002,651 | 148,398 | $21,000,000 | 9,415$ |
| Jamaica | 1 | 5.00 | 0.07% | +0% | 2,961,167 | 2,105 | $15,000 | 11$ |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6.00 | 0.03% | +0% | 67,886,011 | 18,171 | $2,700,000 | 723$ |
| Totals | 4 | 401,849,829 | 168,674 | $23,715,000 | 10,149$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
United States:
America First Legal (AFL) senior counsel James Rogers told Fox News Digital after his organization’s successful lawsuit spearheaded the process in Arizona.
9
United States:
America First Legal Senior Counsel James Rogers argued that the self-deportation push is working because of the 'credible threat of enforcement.'
6
United Kingdom:
James Rogers, the head of product safety testing at Consumer Reports, says that the results are a cause for concern.
6
Jamaica:
James Rogers, the head of product safety at Consumer Reports who led the study, said his hope was to get the information out there because of the lack of research.
5
United States:
America First Legal Senior Counsel James Rogers criticized the ACLU's actions regarding the national defense.
5
United States:
America First Legal Senior Counsel James Rogers stated that courts have universally held that they do not have the power to interfere with the President’s authority.
6