
Mihai Copăceanu
Mihai Copăceanu is a psychologist known for his insights into public sentiment and behavior, particularly in response to political events in Romania. His recent commentary highlights the significant drop in trust and appreciation for former President Klaus Iohannis, emphasizing how the president's perceived arrogance and lack of engagement with citizens during times of crisis have fueled public outrage. Copăceanu's analysis sheds light on the psychological factors contributing to the intense online backlash following Iohannis's announcement of resignation.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Romania | 4 | 5.75 | 0.23% | +20% | 19,237,691 | 53,407 | $250,000 | 694$ |
Totals | 4 | 19,237,691 | 53,407 | $250,000 | 694$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Romania:
Mihai Copăceanu emphasizes the need for cultural education in Romania.
6
Romania:
Mihai Copăceanu shared Cat Smith's article on his Facebook account.
5
Romania:
Psychologist Mihai Copăceanu expressed deep concerns regarding unaccompanied minors at festivals.
5
Romania:
Mihai Copăceanu is a psychologist who raises concerns about drug use among youth at summer festivals.
7
Romania:
Psychologist Mihai Copăceanu noted the lack of enthusiasm from Patriarch Daniel during the ceremony.
5
Romania:
Mihai Copăceanu explains that George Simion's actions are emotional and tactical.
5
Romania:
Mihai Copăceanu is a psychologist analyzing the presidential election results.
5
Romania:
Mihai Copăceanu believes that the current campaign is the most tense, virulent, and aggressive in recent years.
5
Romania:
Mihai Copăceanu analyzed the psychological profiles of George Simion and Nicușor Dan in the context of the presidential elections.
6
Romania:
Psychologist Mihai Copăceanu analyzes the presidential debate candidates and highlights their failures in convincing the public.
5