
Siniša Karan
Siniša Karan is a prominent political figure in the Republic of Srpska, known for his involvement in various governmental and legislative matters. He recently participated in a meeting where officials threatened radical measures in response to any potential legal actions against Milorad Dodik.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14 | 5.21 | 0.56% | +20% | 3,280,815 | 21,933 | $19,000 | 127$ |
Montenegro | 3 | 4.00 | 0.14% | +10% | 628,066 | 995 | $5,500 | 9$ |
Croatia | 2 | 4.50 | 0.06% | +0% | 4,105,267 | 2,667 | $68,000 | 44$ |
Totals | 19 | 8,014,148 | 25,595 | $92,500 | 180$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Siniša Karan is the Minister of Internal Affairs of RS and comments on the constitutional position of Brčko District.
6
Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Siniša Karan stated that the security situation in the entity is favorable and has been declining in crime for years.
7
Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Siniša Karan is the Minister of Internal Affairs of RS and attended the meeting.
6
Montenegro:
Siniša Karan is the Minister of Internal Affairs of Republika Srpska.
5
Montenegro:
Siniša Karan is the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Srpska present at the meeting.
5
Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Siniša Karan stated that the assembly is a constitutional assembly and a referendum.
6
Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Siniša Karan declared that the assembly is a constitutional assembly and a referendum.
6
Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Siniša Karan emphasized the importance of the gathering and the strength of RS.
8
Croatia:
Siniša Karan is the Minister of Internal Affairs of RS who received a letter of concern from the Srebrenica Memorial Center.
5
Bosnia and Herzegovina:
Siniša Karan is the Minister of Internal Affairs RS and has spoken against the centralization of power.
5