Dias Toffoli
Dias Toffoli is a Brazilian Supreme Court Justice who has garnered attention for his controversial decisions, including the annulment of fines related to leniency agreements from the Lava Jato operation, which have raised concerns about corruption in Brazil.
Born on Nov 15, 1967 (58 years old)
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 67 | 5.04 | 6.34% | +30% | 211,049,527 | 17,407,589 | $1,500,000 | 123,722$ |
| Liechtenstein | 6 | 4.67 | 9.38% | +0% | 38,137 | 3,575 | $6,900 | 647$ |
| Totals | 73 | 211,087,664 | 17,411,164 | $1,506,900 | 124,369$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is mentioned as the relator of the case of Banco Master, which is a point of criticism in the article.
5
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is mentioned in the context of the criticisms regarding the handling of the Banco Master case.
5
Brazil:
Toffoli's actions in the Master case have been contested, raising concerns about his decisions.
4
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is mentioned as the relator of the case involving Banco Master, which has drawn criticism.
5
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli's actions in the Master case have been contested, leading to significant criticism.
3
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is mentioned in relation to the criticisms faced by the court regarding decisions related to the Banco Master case.
4
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is a minister of the Supreme Federal Court who decided to lift the confidentiality of testimony records in the Master case.
7
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is a minister at the Supreme Federal Court who determined the hearing for Ailton Aquino's testimony.
6
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is a minister of the Supreme Federal Court who decided to lift the confidentiality of testimony records in the Master case.
7
Brazil:
Dias Toffoli is the minister of the Supreme Federal Court who lifted the judicial secrecy on the recording of Vorcaro's testimony.
5