Leonel Núñez
Leonel Núñez is a constitutional lawyer known for his expertise in Honduran law. He has provided legal commentary on various constitutional matters, emphasizing the rights and responsibilities of government officials. Recently, he was cited in the news discussing the constitutional provisions that allow the Honduran Congress to interpel the chief of the Armed Forces, clarifying that this role is indeed considered a government position and is subject to legislative oversight.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honduras | 5 | 5.40 | 0.52% | +10% | 9,904,608 | 56,510 | $25,000 | 143$ |
| Totals | 5 | 9,904,608 | 56,510 | $25,000 | 143$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez explained that the decree published in La Gaceta did not meet the formal requirements for approval.
6
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez confirmed that the claims about Nasry Asfura announcing a change in the flag's colors are misinformation.
5
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez is another lawyer who promoted an action of unconstitutionality.
5
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez also filed a constitutional challenge against decree 58-2025.
5
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez is a lawyer who, along with Fernando González, filed a constitutional challenge against the decree.
6
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez, president of the Electoral Departmental Committee of the National Party, reported inconsistencies in the functioning of the devices.
6
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez acknowledged issues with biometric devices during the TREP simulation.
5
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez filed a complaint against the National Congress's board for not following due process in forming the permanent commission.
7
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez criticized Fiscal Johel Zelaya's actions regarding the disclosure of the recordings.
3
Honduras:
Leonel Núñez warned that if the audios were obtained without a judicial order, they constitute illegal evidence.
5