
Marlean Ames
Marlean Ames is an Ohio woman who has brought a significant case before the U.S. Supreme Court, alleging discrimination based on her heterosexuality while employed at the Ohio Department of Youth Services. Her claim stems from her belief that she faced a demotion and pay cut while less-qualified LGBT colleagues were promoted, challenging the legal standards of discrimination as outlined in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Not in the pool (under ¢1).
Recent news mentions
Marlean Ames is a heterosexual woman who claimed she was discriminated against for job promotions in favor of gay candidates.
Supreme Court rules unanimously in heterosexual woman's discrimination case
Marlean Ames claims she was denied a promotion and demoted because she is heterosexual.
Nainen ei saanut ylennystä – syyttää työnantajaa heteroiden syrjinnästä
Marlean Ames is a heterosexual woman who filed a discrimination lawsuit against the Ohio Department of Youth Services.
El Supremo de Estados Unidos facilita las demandas por discriminación de blancos y heterosexuales | SociedadMarlean Ames alleged she was discriminated against at her job because she is heterosexual.
US Supreme Court sides with Ohio woman in 'reverse discrimination' caseMarlean Ames started working for Ohio’s state government in 2004 and steadily rose through the ranks at the Department of Youth Services.
Supreme Court sides with straight woman in decision that makes it easier to file ‘reverse discrimination’ suitsMarlean Ames alleged she was discriminated against at her job because she is heterosexual.
US Supreme Court hears arguments in 'straight discrimination' caseMarlean Ames is a heterosexual woman who sued the Ohio Department of Youth Services for discrimination.
El Supremo de Estados Unidos se inclina por facilitar a blancos y heterosexuales las demandas por discriminación | SociedadMarlean Ames is the woman at the center of the case, arguing she was discriminated against because of her heterosexuality.
SCOTUS to hear straight woman's discrimination case that could reshape employment law










