Ketanji Brown Jackson
Ketanji Brown Jackson is an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, having made history as the first African American woman to serve on the Court after her nomination by President Joe Biden in 2021. Prior to her appointment, she served as a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and has a distinguished background in law, including her work as a public defender. Jackson is recognized for her commitment to justice, equality, and her insightful interpretations of the law, which reflect her experiences in the legal system.
Born on Sep 14, 1970 (54 years old)
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 6.21 | 0.43% | +110% | 331,002,651 | 2,981,265 | $21,000,000 | 189,142$ |
| Venezuela | 9 | 6.33 | 0.55% | +20% | 28,435,943 | 186,465 | $48,000 | 315$ |
| Spain | 3 | 7.33 | 0.16% | +10% | 46,754,778 | 83,808 | $1,400,000 | 2,510$ |
| Jamaica | 3 | 6.00 | 0.20% | +10% | 2,961,167 | 6,572 | $15,000 | 33$ |
| Guyana | 3 | 6.00 | 0.23% | +10% | 786,552 | 1,974 | $6,000 | 15$ |
| Dominican Republic | 2 | 6.50 | 0.13% | +0% | 10,847,910 | 13,837 | $89,000 | 114$ |
| India | 2 | 4.00 | 0.11% | +0% | 1,380,004,385 | 1,453,401 | $2,900,000 | 3,054$ |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6.00 | 0.06% | +10% | 67,886,011 | 48,239 | $2,700,000 | 1,919$ |
| Liechtenstein | 2 | 6.00 | 0.13% | +10% | 38,137 | 54 | $6,900 | 10$ |
| France | 2 | 5.50 | 0.12% | +10% | 65,273,511 | 82,911 | $2,700,000 | 3,430$ |
| Peru | 1 | 6.00 | 0.06% | +0% | 32,971,846 | 18,798 | $230,000 | 131$ |
| Portugal | 1 | 7.00 | 0.06% | +0% | 10,196,709 | 5,728 | $240,000 | 135$ |
| Uruguay | 1 | 6.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 3,473,730 | 1,872 | $54,000 | 29$ |
| Mexico | 1 | 5.00 | 0.09% | +0% | 128,932,753 | 120,273 | $1,200,000 | 1,119$ |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 7.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 5,094,118 | 2,656 | $62,000 | 32$ |
| Guatemala | 1 | 6.00 | 0.07% | +0% | 17,915,568 | 12,441 | $82,000 | 57$ |
| Panama | 1 | 6.00 | 0.08% | +0% | 4,314,768 | 3,578 | $76,000 | 63$ |
| Brazil | 1 | 7.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 211,049,527 | 112,861 | $1,500,000 | 802$ |
| Colombia | 1 | 6.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 50,882,884 | 27,475 | $350,000 | 189$ |
| Paraguay | 1 | 7.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 7,132,538 | 3,717 | $38,000 | 20$ |
| Denmark | 1 | 6.00 | 0.06% | +0% | 5,792,202 | 3,249 | $350,000 | 196$ |
| Slovakia | 1 | 8.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 5,459,642 | 2,829 | $110,000 | 57$ |
| Slovenia | 1 | 7.00 | 0.08% | +0% | 2,078,938 | 1,602 | $56,000 | 43$ |
| Monaco | 1 | 7.00 | 0.08% | +0% | 39,242 | 30 | $7,800 | 6$ |
| Nigeria | 1 | 7.00 | 0.05% | +0% | 206,139,589 | 108,552 | $448,000 | 236$ |
| Totals | 62 | 2,625,465,099 | 5,284,187 | $35,668,700 | 203,657$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
United States:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson authored the opinion in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services.
7
Venezuela:
Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concerns about the privacy risks posed by the decision.
5
France:
Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed disagreement with the Supreme Court's decision allowing the DOGE access to sensitive data.
5
United States:
Ketanji Brown Jackson is one of the three liberal justices who dissented in the Supreme Court decision regarding DOGE's access to Social Security data.
7
India:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the ruling creates grave privacy risks for millions.
3
United States:
Ketanji Brown Jackson warned of grave privacy risks for millions of Americans in her dissent regarding DOGE's access to sensitive data.
6
United States:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the opinion of the court in the 9-0 decision regarding Ames' case.
8
Spain:
Ketanji Brown-Jackson wrote the opinion for the Supreme Court ruling on discrimination cases.
9
United States:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the opinion for the court.
8
Venezuela:
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed her public dissent regarding the Supreme Court's decision.
7