
Wilfredo Pedraza
Wilfredo Pedraza is a Peruvian lawyer and the legal representative for former President Ollanta Humala. He has been actively involved in the ongoing legal proceedings against Humala, providing insights into the defense strategy and the implications of judicial changes in the case, particularly emphasizing the importance of continuity in the trial process.
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 4.00 | 0.08% | +0% | 32,971,846 | 24,903 | $230,000 | 174$ |
Totals | 1 | 32,971,846 | 24,903 | $230,000 | 174$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza stated that the proposal for the prison is technically unfeasible due to high costs and lack of resources.
4
Venezuela:
Wilfredo Pedraza, a former director of INPE, criticized the decision against Vizcarra as arbitrary and politically motivated.
7
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza, another former head of the INPE, expressed concerns about the transfer of Martín Vizcarra to Ancón II, suggesting it was politically motivated.
5
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza indicated that the decision regarding Vizcarra's prison placement is influenced by higher authorities within the INPE.
5
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza, another former head of INPE, commented on the administrative issues surrounding Vizcarra's classification.
5
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza is a former Minister of the Interior and former head of INPE.
7
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza is the lawyer representing Ollanta Humala Tasso in his legal matters.
5
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza is the lawyer representing Ollanta Humala and is seeking to annul his client's conviction.
5
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza, exdirector del Inpe, criticized the lack of significant actions by the Executive to comply with the TC's sentence.
4
Peru:
Wilfredo Pedraza is the lawyer representing Ollanta Humala, arguing that there may have been procedural violations in the notification of the sentence.
5