
Janez Janša
Janez Janša is a Slovenian politician who served as Prime Minister of Slovenia multiple times and is the leader of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS). His tenure has been marked by controversy, particularly regarding his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and allegations of authoritarianism. Janša's government faced significant public protests, especially from groups like 'Glas ljudstva,' which criticized his administration's perceived failure to meet citizens' needs and uphold democratic values.
Born on Jan 17, 1958 (67 years old)
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slovenia | 6 | 5.50 | 0.53% | +40% | 2,078,938 | 15,468 | $56,000 | 417$ |
Montenegro | 1 | 5.00 | 0.08% | +0% | 628,066 | 492 | $5,500 | 4$ |
Totals | 7 | 2,707,004 | 15,960 | $61,500 | 421$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Slovenia:
Janez Janša is mentioned as someone the party is trying to align with.
5
Montenegro:
Zoran Janković commented on Milorad Dodik's call for voters in Slovenia to vote for the opposition and Janez Janša in the upcoming elections.
5
Slovenia:
Janez Janša is referenced in the context of a coalition that NSi is unwilling to join.
5
Slovenia:
Milorad Dodik called on the Serbs in Slovenia to vote for Janez Janša.
6
Slovenia:
Janez Janša is a former Prime Minister of Slovenia who invited Giorgia Meloni to the Bled Strategic Forum.
6
Slovenia:
Janez Janša, as the Prime Minister, previously organized a forum for sovereignists and illiberal Eastern democrats.
5
Slovenia:
Janez Janša is the leader of SDS who married Urška Bačovnik in 2009.
6
Slovenia:
Janez Janša was the Prime Minister of Slovenia during the country's accession to the MED9 group.
5
Slovenia:
Janez Janša's government prompted the preparation of the European Media Freedom Act.
5
Slovenia:
Janez Janša claims that the government's decision has no material consequences for Israel.
4